* Daniel Jacobowitz
| On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:50:29PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > * Andreas Barth
| >
| > | Agreed. We should IMHO make such a requirement to be part of etchs
| > | release policy.
| >
| > How are you going to solve the problem ia32-libs solves if not in this
| > way?
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 03:50:29PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Andreas Barth
>
> | Agreed. We should IMHO make such a requirement to be part of etchs
> | release policy.
>
> How are you going to solve the problem ia32-libs solves if not in this
> way?
>
> (Unless we want to make etch full
* Andreas Barth
| Agreed. We should IMHO make such a requirement to be part of etchs
| release policy.
How are you going to solve the problem ia32-libs solves if not in this
way?
(Unless we want to make etch fully multiarchified, which I don't think
we will.)
--
Tollef Fog Heen
* Stephen Quinney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050509 17:20]:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
> > > simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statical
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Christian Hammers wrote:
> > I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
> > simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statically
> > or something similar brute force and ugly.
>
> FWIW:
Christian Hammers wrote:
> I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
> simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statically
> or something similar brute force and ugly.
FWIW: Please don't. This would mean creating a security-support nightmare.
Regar
Andrew Suffield wrote:
[This part of the thread belongs on -legal]
So, there it goes.
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:51:51PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Paul TBBle Hampson]
This of course assumes the phrase "derived work" is legalese for
"code dependancy" or something. I'm sure the GPL ac
[This part of the thread belongs on -legal]
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:51:51PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Paul TBBle Hampson]
> > This of course assumes the phrase "derived work" is legalese for
> > "code dependancy" or something. I'm sure the GPL actually defines
> > what _they_ mean by
[Paul TBBle Hampson]
> This of course assumes the phrase "derived work" is legalese for
> "code dependancy" or something. I'm sure the GPL actually defines
> what _they_ mean by it...
One false assumption and one false premise.
"Derived work" is legalese for "this work is based, at least in part
hi
I happen to mantain 'snmpkit' ; you may give it a look
a.
Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello
>
> [regarding #306840 and with more info in #243870]
>
> One of my packages, Quagga, is licenced under the GPL but is supposed to
> get linked against NetSNMP. That now is problematic, as NetSNMP de
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 20:15 -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:40 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > GNU version of OpenSSL (I don't recall how
> > it is called).
>
> GnuTLS I think.
Stupid mail misconfiguration, I sent this before I got Christian
Hammer's reply
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:08:01AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:06:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > The license of the GNUTLS OpenSSL shim is GPL, causing possible license
> > problems in the other direction with GPL-incompatible apps. It's also not a
> > very
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:06:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The license of the GNUTLS OpenSSL shim is GPL, causing possible license
> problems in the other direction with GPL-incompatible apps. It's also not a
> very complete compatibility layer.
>
So dynamically link against _an_ SSL l
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:40:24PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2005, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > One of my packages, Quagga, is licenced under the GPL but is supposed to
> > get linked against NetSNMP. That now is problematic, as NetSNMP depends
> > on OpenSSL (for S
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:40 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> GNU version of OpenSSL (I don't recall how
> it is called).
GnuTLS I think.
--
The attachment "signature.asc" (if it exists) is a digital signature.
Unless you know what that is, you can completely ignore it. It is mostly
ha
On May 04, Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
> simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statically
> or something similar brute force and ugly.
Or even better just disable SNMP support, which is
Hello
On 2005-05-03 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2005, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > One of my packages, Quagga, is licenced under the GPL but is supposed to
> > get linked against NetSNMP. That now is problematic, as NetSNMP depends
> > on OpenSSL (for SNMPv3 crypto support?
On Wed, 04 May 2005, Christian Hammers wrote:
> One of my packages, Quagga, is licenced under the GPL but is supposed to
> get linked against NetSNMP. That now is problematic, as NetSNMP depends
> on OpenSSL (for SNMPv3 crypto support?) which is not GPL compatible.
A simple extension to Quagga's (
18 matches
Mail list logo
