Re: Upstream and packaging

2015-06-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:28:34AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > If the packaging folder stays until the package reaches Debian, that's > fine. However, if it stays after that, it's bad to have it upstream, > even if it's not conflicting with our workflow. Why? Well, simply > because inste

Re: Upstream and packaging

2015-06-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/07/2015 02:17 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hi, > > What about creating a guide line where upstream creates a directory > Packaging where sub directories are like Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, > Redhat, CentOS, Suse and such? > > So Upstream can ship their tar-balls / git repositories with > the p

Re: Upstream and packaging

2015-06-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Geert Stappers (2015-06-07): > What about creating a guide line where upstream creates a directory > Packaging where sub directories are like Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, > Redhat, CentOS, Suse and such? > > So Upstream can ship their tar-balls / git repositories with > the package stuff ( Spec files, d

Re: Upstream and packaging

2015-06-07 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-06-07 14:17, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Hi, > > What about creating a guide line where upstream creates a directory > Packaging where sub directories are like Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, > Redhat, CentOS, Suse and such? > > So Upstream can ship their tar-balls / git repositories with > the pack