Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> >> > Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There >> > must be >> > something else broken in the changelog

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There > > must be > > something else broken in the changelog file I uploaded… > > > packages.

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There must > be > something else broken in the changelog file I uploaded… > packages.debian.org is not where packages show up. $ lftp -c 'open ftp.debian.org; cd deb

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > 20100723023339|process-upload|dak|Processing changes > file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > 20100723023358|process-upload|dak|installing > changes|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes > > I assume the above is your upload. > > 20100

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-28 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Julien Cristau writes: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > >> while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package >> (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one >> (emboss) >> gives problems: the architecture-depen

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package > (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one > (emboss) > gives problems: the architecture-dependant packages are built, but the

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:59:45AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > > > > > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all > > > ports > > > since at upload time it only contains the source and > > > ar

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-26 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:14:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> That has always been a feature but recently the DAK has changed to throw > >> away the maintainer build debs (while still re

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mike Hommey writes: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Charles Plessy writes: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all >> > ports >> > since at upload time it only contains the source and >> > arc

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > > > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all > > ports > > since at upload time it only contains the source and > > architecture-independant > > binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports > since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant > binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build logs are > available for the architecture I use for upload. > Before I sta

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> Before I start to do the same when possible, is it a bug or a feature ? Both. > That has always been a feature but recently the DAK has changed to throw > away the maintainer build debs (while still requireing them to be > uploaded) and running an autobuild on all archs. Oh, when did that ha

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Charles Plessy writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all > > ports > > since at upload time it only contains the source and > > architecture-independant > > binary

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Charles Plessy writes: > Hi all, > > I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports > since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant > binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build logs are > available for the architect