Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:13:23AM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote: >> Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because >> you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from >> that upload? > > Why would ftp-master want

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Bloom
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:13:23AM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote: > >>Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because >>you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from >>that upload? > > > Why would ftp-master want to work on specia

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:13:23AM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote: > Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because > you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from > that upload? Why would ftp-master want to work on special-casing amd64 for this instead of

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-22 Thread Ken Bloom
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "=?iso-8859-15?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>I meantioned one solution. There is another possible one: source uploads. >>And no, I don't think it would cause more breakages than nowdays because >>uploading sources only doesn't meant package

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > There are some implementation details that someone would have to fix > first [...] > So while theoretically source only uploads would be great practically > there are problems. I sure hope patches would be welcome though. Well, if Ubuntu impleme

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-21 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"=?iso-8859-15?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I meantioned one solution. There is another possible one: source uploads. > And no, I don't think it would cause more breakages than nowdays because > uploading sources only doesn't meant packages have not been build on > our syst

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10480 March 1977, W. Borgert wrote: >> I meantioned one solution. There is another possible one: source uploads. >> And no, I don't think it would cause more breakages than nowdays because >> uploading sources only doesn't meant packages have not been build on >> our systems. > I couldn't agree

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread W. Borgert
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:20:59PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: > I meantioned one solution. There is another possible one: source uploads. > And no, I don't think it would cause more breakages than nowdays because > uploading sources only doesn't meant packages have not been build on > our systems.

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:23:37PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote: > would assume that it was fairly ovbious that the binary upload would need > to be > for an offical arcitecture, which amd64 is not (yet). In fact, it is > probably not reccomended > to be developing under a system that is not offically

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread Jérôme Marant
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Not good. What is missing to get this fixed? > > Well There are two mirror changes. I suspect that scc will need to become > operational, > before amd64 is added to ftp-master. The scc change is a big change and > certainly has te potential to break thi

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread Joe Smith
Jérôme Marant said: Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Jérôme Marant schrieb: > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? No. Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :) Not good. What is missing to get this fixed? Well There are two mi

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-20 Thread Jérôme Marant
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And why would you need to do that? > > [This might sound harsh but it isn't ment as critizism] Is the > inconvenience of having a i386 chroot on your amd64 to build and > upload packages too much? You should have a chroot for building > packages a

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"=?iso-8859-15?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: >>> Quoting Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > * Jérôme Marant: >>> > > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 p

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-19 Thread Jérôme Marant
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Quoting Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > * Jérôme Marant: >> > > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? >> > >> > amd64 is not yet part of the archive. It

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-19 Thread Jérôme Marant
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess so, but I haven't seen any status update about this. >> Are there even people working on it? > > According to what I've heard, it's not so much an issue of "working on > it", but simply "doing it", i.e. something in the scale of a 30-minute > c

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-19 Thread Jérôme Marant
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:09:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Jérôme Marant schrieb: > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? > >>> No. > If not, is there any upl

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:09:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Jérôme Marant schrieb: >>> Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? >> No. >>> If not, is there any upload queue dedicated at them? >> Nope. > So, I guess I ha

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:10:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Quoting Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * Jérôme Marant: > > > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? > > > > amd64 is not yet part of the archive. It depends on the so-called > > "mirror split". >

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jérôme Marant: > Quoting Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> * Jérôme Marant: >> >> > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? >> >> amd64 is not yet part of the archive. It depends on the so-called >> "mirror split". > > I guess so, but I haven't seen any status up

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Jérôme Marant: > > > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? > > amd64 is not yet part of the archive. It depends on the so-called > "mirror split". I guess so, but I haven't seen any status update about this. Are there eve

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Jérôme Marant
Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jérôme Marant schrieb: > > > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? > > No. > Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :) Not good. What is missing to get this fixed? > > If not, is there any upload queue

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Jérôme Marant schrieb: > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? No. Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :) > If not, is there any upload queue dedicated at them? Nope. Well. Yes (again). But only about 5 people are allowed to upload there, plus

Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jérôme Marant: > Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? amd64 is not yet part of the archive. It depends on the so-called "mirror split".