On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:33:58AM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Second, there's a regression in the handling of in-memory file handle.
> Broke my code when giving it a first try on jessie. And I am still
> *very* upset why #747363 should be anything below RC.
I find arguments about bug severit
Paul Wise wrote...
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>
> > In 5.18, upstream decided to discourage usage of smart matches and
> > given..when after these have existed since 5.10 (or: more than six
> > years) by marking them as experimental, and did this in a very harsh
> >
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> In 5.18, upstream decided to discourage usage of smart matches and
> given..when after these have existed since 5.10 (or: more than six
> years) by marking them as experimental, and did this in a very harsh
> way. This will drive me away fr
gregor herrmann wrote...
> Which kind of problems did you see with new Perl versions (I could
> imagine incompatible old third-party software), and is there
> something the Debian perl maintainers and/or the Debian Perl Group
> can do to improve the situation?
At first I was about to say those wh
4 matches
Mail list logo
