* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 01:18]:
> >Has there been any agreement about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
> >Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
> >can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o?
>
> I don't like the idea of removing cantus3
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-06 22:10]:
From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality originally present in cantus.
And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
have no interest neither in incorporating bug f
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-03 14:54]:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next
> few days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of
> these packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never
> been part of a stable release;
* Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-06 22:10]:
> >>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
> > functionality originally present in cantus.
>
> And it won't either -- the upstream is unresponsive and seems to
> have no interest neither in incorporating bug fixes nor
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
> > please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
> >
> > Specifical
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 00:24 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Your latest comment in #259581 is completely different from this --
> please keep the relevant wnpp bug in the loop for stuff like this!
>
> Specifically, your latest recorded comment about bbconf is "No, I will
> not take care a
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
> > days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
> > packages have been
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 15:01 -0400, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
>
> So, I recently sent an email to the bbconf upstream to know if they're
> going to keep working on it. Therefore, I think that we should wait a
> bit to know his answers and then I will reply.
Quoting Upstream:
"Hm. Well, I agree, it
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 14:54 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next few
> days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of these
> packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never been part
> of a stable release;
Ari Pollak wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>>#287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
>>Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 123 days old.
>>obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
>
>
>>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually prov
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #287985: O: cantus -- Gnome tool to mass-rename/tag mp3 and ogg files
> Reported by: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 123 days old.
> obsoleted by cantus3 which is packaged already
>From what I can tell, cantus3 doesn't actually provide all of the
functionality
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:29:37PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 11:05]:
> > Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
> > guess that means I'm too late?
>
> No, they are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnp
* François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 11:05]:
> Both are gone of http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/rfa_bypackage, I
> guess that means I'm too late?
No, they are listed at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned
"rfa_bypackage" is for packages which are RFA: Request For Adopt
On May 4, 2005 04:38 am, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hello François,
>
> * François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 10:08]:
> > On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> > > Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hello François,
* François-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 10:08]:
> On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> > #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> > Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
> >
> > #297427: O: langband-dat
François-Denis Gonthier wrote:
>On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>
>>#297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
>>Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
>>
>>#297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
>>langband e
On May 3, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> #297426: O: langband -- The langband Common lisp game
> Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 63 days old.
>
> #297427: O: langband-data -- The Langband sound/image/etc files for
> langband engine Reported by: "Kevin M. Rosenberg"
17 matches
Mail list logo
