On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 12:04:59AM +1200,
bounce-debian-devel=cbannister=slingshot.co...@lists.debian.org wrote:
Weird! Don't know what happened here. :(
--
The media's the most powerful entity on earth.
They have the power to make the innocent guilty
and to make the guilty innocent, and that
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Solal wrote:
> I think next releases of Iceweasel should be build *without* EME and
> any other DRM-related stuff.
Iceweasel is not available on MacOS X, which you appear to be using.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
(keeping everything CC'ed...dunno if that's what's expected)
Quoting Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org):
> pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Bcc:
> Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
> Reply-To:
>
> Hi,
>
> The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (a
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:05:31AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on
> > google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on
> > how it has been imp
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 07:35:07PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> There is a quite good pdf on Uli's page. Search Ullrich Drepper on
> google, you should be able to find it. IIRC there is the explanation on
> how it has been implemented for a few archs, quite extensively annotated.
Is this the
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Hi m68k and Hurd porters,
You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be
implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is
still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current
state.
We want to release lenny w
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:40:53AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:20:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be
> > implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is
> > still not the case for m
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 03:20:00PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> You were previously made aware[0] that glibc-2.6 needs TLS to be
> implemented for your ports to build and work properly, sadly this is
> still not the case for m68k, and insufficient for Hurd in the current
> state.
The last tim
On 5/22/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:00:43PM -0700, Hex Star wrote:> Hmmm...interesting...the other time someone posted something explicit and> someone replied to it and pointed it out, everyone joined in and> investigated it...this time the person wh
Hex Star wrote:
Hmmm...interesting...the other time someone posted something explicit
and someone replied to it and pointed it out, everyone joined in and
investigated it...this time the person who points it out gets
criticized...go figure...I always get the short end of the stick...
I don'
Hmmm...interesting...the other time someone posted something explicit and someone replied to it and pointed it out, everyone joined in and investigated it...this time the person who points it out gets criticized...go figure...I always get the short end of the stick...
On 5/21/06, Bas Zoetekouw <[EM
o_O...I wonder if these explicit messages, and these obviously have the intent of being explicit are going to cause the same rise as the last explicit message sent to this list...a shame people send such nonsense to these helpful and knowladgeable lists...*sigh*...
On 5/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
[
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 06:35:59AM -0800, John Gee wrote:
> marc writes:
> If nothing else "Joseph Smidt" at least you seem to be someone who
> cares enough about Debian to spend your time contemplating about it. But
> this is a meritacrosy, and you are not a developer. I refer you to your
ZHUANG, Hao spake thus:
> unsubscribe
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I urge you to read the last two lines of each -devel message :))
Leon
--
Leon Breedt | Develop
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Jose Marin wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Gu Xiangqian wrote:
> > > Would you do me a favor? I want compile a Fortran program
> > > with g77:
> > > program gg
> > > integer i
> > > i
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Jose Marin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Gu Xiangqian wrote:
> > Would you do me a favor? I want compile a Fortran program
> > with g77:
> > program gg
> > integer i
> > i=999
> > print*,i
> > stop
> >
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Gu Xiangqian wrote:
> Would you do me a favor? I want compile a Fortran program
> with g77:
> program gg
> integer i
> i=999
> print*,i
> stop
> end
> But G77 cannot do it. Yes I wish that the default of
> integer
> FAKEROOT: after stat, failing?: known=0, stat=d:i=(2051:196739),
> mode=0100664, nlink=1,
I've seen this too (on an x86 hamm system) but I forget if I filed it.
Running "fakeroot alien" on a .tar.gz file triggered it; the .tar.gz
file happenned to have pathnames longer than dpkg can handle [gr
> > I don't know that the patch even exists anymore. However, a quick and
> > dirty hack is only a two line change in read_entry.c.
>
> Actually, ncurses source is clear and commented enough that I don't even
> think this counts as q-n-d just because it's quite obvious what's going on.
The reas
I wrote:
> I've added/edited various README's and .message files. Take a look at
> what you see now; I think it's pretty hard to miss ...
I forgot to say that I *didn't* edit README.DEBIAN.
Ian M., can you do that ?
Ian.
Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: Unidentified subject!"):
> Matthew Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > I don't know if this is a good news or bad news.
> > but I think there is a big misunderstanding about debian-0.93 and debian-1.0
> > I really forse
On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, Ian Murdock wrote:
>
> Why would the mirror program be removing debian-0.93?
>
No, They have told mirror to exclude it due to space restrictions
I have been telling them NOT to mirror 1.0 if they are under a space crunch.
But rather just get debian-0.93 instead..
--
M
Matthew Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I don't know if this is a good news or bad news.
> but I think there is a big misunderstanding about debian-0.93 and debian-1.0
> I really forsee the need to do this
>
> debian-0.93
> release -> debian-0.93
> development/debian-1.0
> NOTICE: NO LINK
> d
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:17:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Matthew Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am getting 10 - 15 complaints a day about this debian-1.0 and how
it won't install all the way or that it isn't all ELF as advertised
previously. Well I know I bite my teeth and press delete on al
Andrew D. Fernandes wrote:
> Date: Sun Oct 15 20:39:21 EDT 1995
> Package: nls
> Version: 1.0-1
> Description: The XFree86 Motif-1.2 resource defaults.
> Priority: Low
> # File:
> File: nls-1.0-1.deb 10086 97a80aaba566821cf61aa92c06421e74 binary/x11
> File: nls-1.0-1.tar.gz 10727 1100fc45b
25 matches
Mail list logo
