On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:04:53PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Given that there were a number (28?) sent before voting peoriod
> started, I'm not convinced that people will actually do that.
I wouldn't have expected receiving the call for votes before the
voting period starts :)
Independently
Quoting Neil McGovern (n...@halon.org.uk):
> Yes, it would. And so would expecting people to read the mail. Given
I think that what confused people is that former calls for votes had
this Reply-To field setup. Thankfully you did send this mail so, when
time came to vote (after reading the GR), I
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:20:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:34 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> >> Then mail the ballot to: gr_nonpackag...@vote.debian.org.
> >
> > This means it shouldn't be sent to secret...@debian.org. I'm re-attaching
> > the ballot below, with a Reply-To se
On 10/05/2010 02:34 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> Then mail the ballot to: gr_nonpackag...@vote.debian.org.
>
> This means it shouldn't be sent to secret...@debian.org. I'm re-attaching
> the ballot below, with a Reply-To set for convenience.
Setting a proper reply-to in the announcement-mail woul
4 matches
Mail list logo
