Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is nice to see.
>
> IME, as a release manager/bug triager and as a member of package maintenance
> teams, the distributions I want to be able to use for bug mails are:
>
> - to the submitter and to the maintainer (most common)
> - to the maintainer only
> and IME as
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> It's trivial to add uids to a GPG key, and headers aren't actually
> signed anyway, so you could replay signed messages to the server.
A global, confirmed "by default subscribe me to all my bugs" might do
the trick, though.
--
"You
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:05:51PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
> > > Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 00:33 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >> As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
> >> anymore? Sort of greylisting?
> >>
> >> Sounds good.
> >
> > It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
> > made the decision tha
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 06:25 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Don Armstrong]
> > What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
> > submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
> > is added to prevent that.
>
> Sounds good. But since this information was alr
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
> > Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
> > to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
>
> Wh
>> As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
>> anymore? Sort of greylisting?
>>
>> Sounds good.
>
> It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
> made the decision that they don't want to have to opt-in.
Maybe it should honour subscription requ
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> >>
> >> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> >> the Bug Tracking System. To do
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:39:19PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Petter Reinholdtsen:
> > [Florian Weimer]
> >> Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
> >> probably never receive the message.
> >
> > What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address?
>
> It's an alias for the e
[Re-sent, gmane seems to have swallowed the original version.]
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Florian Weimer]
>> Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
>> probably never receive the message.
> What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I thought it send
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
>>
>> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
>> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where
>>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
>
> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED], where
> nnn is the bug number you wish to {,un}subscribe
Hello Don,
Am 2005-07-22 15:30:35, schrieb Don Armstrong:
> What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
> submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
> is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
> happen without even needing t
[Don Armstrong]
> What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
> submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
> is added to prevent that.
Sounds good. But since this information was already tracked, I figured
there must have been a (good?) reason this ha
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Jochen Voss:
>
>> Hi Goswin,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
>
>> Really? Since when is this the case?
>
> Just to stress Jochen's point:
* Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Florian Weimer]
>> Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
>> probably never receive the message.
>
> What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address?
It's an alias for the email address of the submitter. AFAICS,
messages to this address do not end up
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Not subscribing the initial submitter would be insane and subscribing
> him is already the current way.
Not in the sense that's being discussed here, it isn't.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [
[Florian Weimer]
> Developers must be careful to Cc: the submitters, otherwise they
> probably never receive the message.
What about the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? I thought it send
a message both to BTS and to the submitter? I use it all the time
when I want the submitter to get the message. I
* Don Armstrong:
> No, it wouldn't. The messages are only sent to people after they have
> made it through the spam filters, and for sumitter, it's even more
> difficult, because the message must be formatted properly to actually
> generate a new bug instead of an error.
>
> The idea was for the s
* Jochen Voss:
> Hi Goswin,
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
> Really? Since when is this the case?
Just to stress Jochen's point: only closing a bug report automatically
triggers mail to
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
Really? Since when is this the case?
Jochen
--
http://seehuhn.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >> Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
> >> Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
> >> to it. Wou
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>>> What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
>>> submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
>>> is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
>>> happen wi
* Goswin von Brederlow:
>> What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
>> submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
>> is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
>> happen without even needing to confirm the subscription... b
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>> Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
>> Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
>> to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
>
> What has actually b
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
> Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
> to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
submitte
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 00:33 +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> now, how about [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I have a
> feeling that co-maintainers/uploaders get bug reports for a project.
Use the package tracking system[1] for this.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org
--
To UNS
On 22/07/05, Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> One of the oft-requested features for the BTS had been the ability to
> subscribe to bugs.
>
> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email
Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> One of the oft-requested features for the BTS had been the ability to
> subscribe to bugs.
>
> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> the Bug Tracking System.
...
> Many thanks to Joachim Breitner and Do
[Pascal Hakim]
> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THANK YOU, those of you who coded and deployed this! This is something
I've wanted as long as I can reme
30 matches
Mail list logo
