On 12.10.2014 23:41, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I thought that the pm-suspend part of acpid/acpi-support was disabled
> when systemd is detected. See /usr/share/acpi-support/policy-funcs.
I forgot to mention that the experiment was on a sysvinit-core setup,
i.e. no pid 1 systemd. With systemd it works
❦ 12 octobre 2014 20:54 +0200, Thomas Koch :
>> Isn't the pm-powersave stuff still working due to being invoked by acpid?
>
> Thanks for your hint.
>
> I experimented a bit and found that acpid + acpi-support call
> pm-suspend. I found nothing that calls pm-powersave upon changing the
> power so
Hi Vincent,
> Isn't the pm-powersave stuff still working due to being invoked by acpid?
Thanks for your hint.
I experimented a bit and found that acpid + acpi-support call
pm-suspend. I found nothing that calls pm-powersave upon changing the
power source (ac <-> bat).
Regards, Thomas
--
Thoma
Hi Gregor,
> That would make me sad, as I'm using both. Maybe this changes after I
> switch to systemd but right now I need both.
Granted. I can't stand saddening my users.
After some more testing i found a way to fully support non-systemd
setups: TLP's pm-suspend hook is installed again.
Can yo
Hi Martin,
thanks for your helpful insights.
>> see [3] –, neither is pm-suspend called by systemd's sleep.target.
> Not by systemd as pid 1, but if you run with upstart or sysvinit,
> systemd-shim will use pm-utils if it is installed, so that suspend
> quirks still work.
My experiments showed th
Hi,
>> see [3] –, neither is pm-suspend called by systemd's sleep.target.
>
> Not by systemd as pid 1, but if you run with upstart or sysvinit,
> systemd-shim will use pm-utils if it is installed, so that suspend
> quirks still work.
>
> IMHO it is a bit unfortunate that all the suspend quirks a
On Oct 09, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Questions:
> - Am i missing something here?
Last time I discussed this with the other systemd maintainers it
appeared that something (what?) still uses the pm-powersave
infrastructure, which does not have a systemd equivalent.
If this can be solved then I'm all f
Hello,
Thomas Koch [2014-10-09 20:18 +0200]:
> Looking into the current pm-utils package in Debian testing i noticed
> that it is kind of inert: nor is pm-powersave called by upowerd –
> changed in upower 0.99.1-1
That is a good point. I didn't really notice yet as in Ubuntu we still
have the old
❦ 9 octobre 2014 20:18 +0200, Thomas Koch :
> Older TLP packages – available via my PPA, not in Debian – depend on
> pm-utils (pm-suspend) for being called upon suspend/resume events. The
> necessity to depend on (and coexist with) pm-utils is imho gone with
> Debian's move to systemd.
>
> Look
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:18:47 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> i'm the author of the TLP power management tool [1].
I'm a happy user of TLP - thanks for writing it.
> Older TLP packages – available via my PPA, not in Debian – depend on
> pm-utils (pm-suspend) for being called upon suspend/resume even
10 matches
Mail list logo
