On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:29, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:06:23 +0200, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> > any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> > T
Em Mon, 15 Apr 2002 12:06:23 +0200, David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> The medium will be unmounted after a 'user defined' time. I've chosen
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:27:15PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> > > Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> > > automount is the following:
> > > I'm a
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> > Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> > automount is the following:
> > I'm a CS teacher, and the linux distribution in the computer room is
> > man
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> automount is the following:
> I'm a CS teacher, and the linux distribution in the computer room is
> mandrake. And, very often, a student use supermount to mount a floppy,
> do som
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:54:48PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
>
> > > The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let you do
> > > stupid thing such as e
Le lun 15/04/2002 à 12:32, David Findlay a écrit :
> Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that
> way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the documentation is
> not clear on setting it up. Everyone runs around saying they want to make
> Debian e
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let you do
> > stupid thing such as ejecting a medium in use.
Depending on what "use" means it's not the user that is stupid, bu
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> Supermount is a very bad hack, and as the problem of letting a user
> 'lock' a removable medium, if it is "superunmounted" when still in use.
This flaw is notable, unfortunately. However, this is a matter of
permissions really. If onl
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 05:17, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
> makes things much easier to use. Thanks,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:31, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> > > Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it
> > > that way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the
> >
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that
> way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the documentation is
> not clear on setting it up. Everyone runs around saying they want to make
> Debian easy for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:06, David Odin wrote:
> Automount will mount the medium as soon as you access it. I fail to see
> any use of mounting a medium when it is put, and before it is accessed.
> The medium will be unmounted after a 'user defined' tim
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:38:26PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> > debi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
> makes things much easier to
16 matches
Mail list logo
