Re: Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-04 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. So what's the result of this discussion now?! ^^ Chris. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-03 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Am 03.02.2012 12:46, schrieb Thomas Goirand: I think you are under estimating how much work Ondrej has done already in the past, and how much *more* work you are asking him to do here, when the whole PHP team is shouting for help! Yes, adding yet another build *is more work*, not less. Well I

Re: Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/03/2012 08:28 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > The reasons why I've opened #657698 was just, because I though it could > be possible for the PHP maintainers to reduce their burden, by just > offering both, packages with suhosin and without. > If there are bugs in the with suhosin version

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-02 Thread Florian Anderiasch
On 02/03/2012 01:28 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > But this wouldn't solve our discussion here... the question would > still be open, whether Debian sets this flag or not, or whether it > makes two binary packages. Now that's something I didn't read from Ondřej's mail, but delivering the pa

Re: Suhosin patch disabled by default in Debian php5 builds

2012-02-02 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey. First, thanks Ondřej, for bringing this to a wider audience :) On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 13:55 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > 1. Suhosin patch has an impact on the speed and memory usage. This has > been documented and even author admits it [1]. > > 2. It doesn't help our users when reporting b