On 18/08/2024 11:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:23 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
[...]--
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the
architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel pac
On 8/18/24 11:23 AM, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the
Hi list,
On 18/08/2024 11:23, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel
Hi;
On 18/08/2024 06:11, Wookey wrote:
On 2024-08-17 17:58 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
To make it more interesting, the simple -latomic fix doesn't seem to cut it
That's a pity, it sounds plausible. I'll try to take a look.
Thanks!
That said, unless you have oceans of time, perhaps it might m
On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:23 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >
[...]
> > > If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the
> > > architecture — you
> > > ca
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas
> > wrote:
> > > Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
> > If you can’t fix the build, you don’
Hi Stephen,
On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:46:45 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Or just exclude that architecture i. e., list all archs but armel?
If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the architecture — you
can ask for removal of the armel package in testing. That will allow the
package to migrate even
On 2024-08-17 17:58 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
>
> Fair enough. But TBH, i just cannot wait "a couple of weeks" for a possible
> reply; there are users waiting for the backports as I write.
Fair enough. If you can't wait then you can't wait.
> To make it more interesting, the simple -latomic
On 17/08/2024 14:42, Wookey wrote:
On 2024-08-16 17:46 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
From another perspective: what is the right thing to do in a situation like
this? Trying to hunt down the problem, and thus causing all sorts of noise
like this message? This is what the policy says, but still
On 2024-08-16 17:46 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
>
> From another perspective: what is the right thing to do in a situation like
> this? Trying to hunt down the problem, and thus causing all sorts of noise
> like this message? This is what the policy says, but still...
>
> Or just exclude that arc
Hi Timo and Paul,
On 16/08/2024 18:10, Timo Röhling wrote:
Hi Alec,
* Alec Leamas [2024-08-16 17:46]:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/atomic_futex.h:278:(.text+0x16dc): undefined
reference to
`std::__atomic_futex_unsigned_base::_M_futex_notify_all(unsigned int*)'
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/include/c++/14/b
Hi Alec,
* Alec Leamas [2024-08-16 17:46]:
/usr/include/c++/14/bits/atomic_futex.h:278:(.text+0x16dc): undefined reference
to `std::__atomic_futex_unsigned_base::_M_futex_notify_all(unsigned int*)'
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/include/c++/14/bits/atomic_futex.h:278:(.text+0x29d8):
undefined reference to
Hi,
On 16-08-2024 17:46, Alec Leamas wrote:
All other builds are OK. Has anyone a hint about what might be going on here?
https://release.debian.org/testing/arch_qualify.html armel column.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
