Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never mind - I forgot how I handled it the last time, from the 1.0 to
> the 1.1 upgrade. Just test in the preinst for the previous version and
> show a warning, upgrade instructions and a prompt there. Seemed to
> work the last time .. so it will
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I did notice a reference on the mailing list (no specifics), on a way
>you could keep your existing cache hierarchy with squid2.
Yes, by running the old and the new server at the same time and
requesting all stored dat
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> I'm currently maintaining squid, and squid-2.0 has been released. We have
> been running the beta versions on our own machines for quite some time
> and it's much better/faster than the 1.2 versions.
>
> However the problem is dat squid-2.0 is totally incompatible w
On 8 Oct 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >However the problem is dat squid-2.0 is totally incompatible with squid-1.2.
> >The cache directory and file format has changed, and the config file
> >format has c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes:
> Never mind - I forgot how I handled it the last time, from the 1.0 to
> the 1.1 upgrade. Just test in the preinst for the previous version and
> show a warning, upgrade instructions and a prompt there. Seemed to
> work the last time .. so it will
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Miquel van Smoorenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>However the problem is dat squid-2.0 is totally incompatible with squid-1.2.
>The cache directory and file format has changed, and the config file
>format has changed .. in fact it's a new package.
Never mind - I fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
