Mehdi Dogguy, le Thu 16 Dec 2010 10:17:05 +0100, a écrit :
> On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
> >> still can't fit on just CD1.
> >
> > This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
> > re
On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
>> still can't fit on just CD1.
>
> This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
> reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate any testing you
>
Joey Hess, le Wed 15 Dec 2010 14:02:38 -0400, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
> > still can't fit on just CD1.
>
> This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
> reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate a
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
> still can't fit on just CD1.
This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate any testing you
can do.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description:
And here are the values for amd64:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 15 Dec 2010 02:34:00 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:00:16 +0200, a écrit :
> > - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB
> > (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends
> > xauth, x1
Hello,
Here is an updated report on task size:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:00:16 +0200, a écrit :
> - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB
> (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends
> xauth, x11 stuff gets installed)
Still 492MiB. One nice thing is
Ben Armstrong, le Sat 30 Oct 2010 06:54:16 -0300, a écrit :
> On 30/10/10 05:11 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to see what is in the tasks without reinstalling?
> > From /usr/share/tasksel/debian-tasks.desc it would seem that web-
> > server only pulls apache2-mpm-prefork, and
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Christian PERRIER, le Mon 01 Nov 2010 12:03:51 +0100, a écrit :
> > Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions.
> >
> > Additionnall, a test today with beta1
Christian PERRIER, le Mon 01 Nov 2010 12:03:51 +0100, a écrit :
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > Hello,
> >
> > Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions.
>
> Additionnall, a test today with beta1, on a 1GiB disk (virtual
> machine) and the "separate home" p
severity 528914 serious
thanks
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Hello,
>
> Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions.
Additionnall, a test today with beta1, on a 1GiB disk (virtual
machine) and the "separate home" partman-auto recipe lead to failure
because of
On 30/10/10 05:11 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Is there an easy way to see what is in the tasks without reinstalling?
> From /usr/share/tasksel/debian-tasks.desc it would seem that web-
> server only pulls apache2-mpm-prefork, and I have no idea how that
> could account for this increase
$ taskse
On Friday 29 October 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-10-29 11:58 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >> Or, for a less drastic solution, use localepurge. Losing the
> >> docs is a significant loss, you don't want to suffer that
> >> un
On Wednesday 27 October 2010, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:36:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > FWIW, it's what worked best when I set up Time Machine over the
> > network.
>
> Well I must admit that I consider the file server task totally
> useless. Who really wants IPX,
>> > Indeed, installling Squeeze (without any task) needs 460MiB
>>
>> If you want to trim that down, you should *definitely* use Emdebian
>> where the packages themselves have this content already trimmed out.
>
> Or, for a less drastic solution, use localepurge. Losing the docs is a
> significan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:09:32PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > I really wonder why you still need to install "locales" to get UTF-8. Even
> > in current glibc, it's a second class citizen. Several years ago, I
> > benchmarked
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> I really wonder why you still need to install "locales" to get UTF-8. Even
> in current glibc, it's a second class citizen. Several years ago, I
> benchmarked a mockup of hard-coding UTF-8 the way ISO-8859-1 and KOI8-R were
> don
On 2010-10-29 11:58 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>
>> Or, for a less drastic solution, use localepurge. Losing the docs is a
>> significant loss, you don't want to suffer that unless your machine is a
>> really small dinky gadget. T
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:56 +0200
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > > Indeed, installling Squeeze (without any task) needs 460MiB
> >
> > If you want to trim that
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:57:23AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:56 +0200
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Indeed, installling Squeeze (without any task) needs 460MiB
>
> If you want to trim that down, you should *definitely* use Emdebian
> where the packages themselves ha
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 18:00:16 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I forgot to mention other tasks as well:
>
> - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB
> (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends
> xauth, x11 stuff gets installed)
>
fwiw db4.5 is (finally) out of
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 18:29:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Sven Joachim, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:16:43 +0200, a écrit :
> > On 2010-10-27 17:20 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > /lib (except modules) 9276 14096 4820 (notably 3.6M
> > > discover)
> >
> > Why does discover g
Neil Williams, le Fri 29 Oct 2010 09:57:23 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Indeed, installling Squeeze (without any task) via the network needs
> > 460MiB free on /, so you don't really have room for swap. Once the
> > .debs cleaned, you're still with 340MiB, while Lenny needed only
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:20:56 +0200
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Indeed, installling Squeeze (without any task) via the network needs
> 460MiB free on /, so you don't really have room for swap. Once the
> .debs cleaned, you're still with 340MiB, while Lenny needed only 268MiB
> for the same base syst
On 10/27/2010 06:36 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> FWIW, it's what worked best when I set up Time Machine over the network.
That sounds like they're using CNIDs then... Indeed netatalk is the only way to
get such things done properly.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Devel
On 10/27/2010 06:11 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Is netatalk STILL included in the file server task? Who uses that
> anymore? The thing takes almost 2 minutes to start at boot (or at
> least if feels like it) and probably no Mac made in a decade has any
> need for it.
It needs two minutes to s
* Samuel Thibault:
> - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB
> (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?,
I suspect that this is caused primarily by API and ABI
incompatibility, and in part by the lack of response to bug reports
from upstream. Everybody who uses Berkeley DB extensively has once
been
26 matches
Mail list logo
