On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:58:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > > Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
> > >> [...] as long
> > >> as there is a way to build-depend on the build-d
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 08:50:39 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
> >> [...] as long
> >> as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a
> >> source package, that should be fine. As a bon
On 12-05-13 04:03, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Wookey wrote:
>
>> I'd vote for that too, as it would be very helpful for
>> cross-toolchain building. I hadn't realised that source build-deps
>> was a possibility. Is it? Does anyone have a proposal for how it might
>> work?
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 06:03:30PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-09 10:46 +0200]:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > > * source build dependencies (such that e.g binutils-mingw-w64 build
> > > depends on src:binutils instead of binutils-source)
>
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
>> [...] as long
>> as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a
>> source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can get rid of
>> mk-build-deps :)
>
> How so?
In my case,
Le 13/05/2013 15:51, Paul Wise a écrit :
> [...] as long
> as there is a way to build-depend on the build-dependencies for a
> source package, that should be fine. As a bonus we can get rid of
> mk-build-deps :)
How so?
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Should a dependency of a source package src:A on src:foo not mean that src:A
> also automatically build depends on the build dependencies of src:foo?
Not necessarily, src:A could be building with a different set of build
options. For exam
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2013-05-12 04:03:54)
> Another one I would like is to be able to depend or build-dep on
> foo:build-depends or foo [Build-Depends] (or by extension foo:depends), which
> would mean we could get rid of the ugly hack that is mk-build-deps.
Should a dependency of a source pack
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Wookey wrote:
> I'd vote for that too, as it would be very helpful for
> cross-toolchain building. I hadn't realised that source build-deps
> was a possibility. Is it? Does anyone have a proposal for how it might
> work?
It isn't a possibility yet, it could be if
+++ Stephen Kitt [2013-05-09 10:46 +0200]:
> On Thu, 9 May 2013 10:10:01 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > * source build dependencies (such that e.g binutils-mingw-w64 build
> > depends on src:binutils instead of binutils-source)
>
> Yes! That was on my list as well ;-). The Built-Using stanza co
10 matches
Mail list logo
