Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

2011-06-10 Thread Simon Paillard
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > > the debian/control file? > > > > Package: ntp > > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > > Depends: ... > > No,

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

2011-06-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > the debian/control file? > > Package: ntp > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > Depends: ... No, but "linux-any kfreebsd-any" might work. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UN

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

2011-06-10 Thread Svante Signell
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:10 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Svante Signell writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > > source. Is there an easy way to achieve th

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

2011-06-10 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Svante Signell writes: > Hi, > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override > statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries