On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 08:15, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> There's the question of botched uploads. I think we've all accidentally
> >> botched an upload one time or another, and having access to auric means
> >> we can fix it without having to call on
Le lun 15/12/2003 à 14:56, Colin Watson a écrit :
> > This is the kind of services that should be available on the web.
> > Making the NEW queue available on the web just like incoming.d.o would
> > also be valuable.
>
> The NEW queue isn't exported for reasons of US crypto regulations. That
> sai
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:51:58PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> > Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a
> > specific packages are available?
> >
> > I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
>
> Thi
Le dim 14/12/2003 à 23:53, Brian May a écrit :
> Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a specific
> packages are available?
>
> I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
This is the kind of services that should be available on the web. Making
the NEW qu
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There's the question of botched uploads. I think we've all accidentally
>> botched an upload one time or another, and having access to auric means
>> we can fix it without having to call on the ftpmasters for help.
> It depends on whether the queue da
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:51:05PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> > to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> > of discussing inform
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric,
>
There's the question of botched uploads. I think
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
* Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-13 15:56]:
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
>
> Thus, if the ftpmasters are planning on a long-term restriction on
> auric, mirroring the data in the new queue [at least
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
11 matches
Mail list logo
