On 2013-07-15, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> When the SONAME increments the associated binary library package has a new
> name,
> so the SONAME suffix has to increment as well accordingly: for a library
> package
> lambda, the binary library package could be renamed from liblambda0 to
> liblambda1.
>
2013/7/15 Jerome BENOIT :
> the former binary package
> liblambda0 is not discarded by the new binary package liblambda1, neither in
> Sid
> nor at the upgrading stage with aptitude.
> I guess that something is missing in `debian/control', any clue ?
I think this is intentional. And this is why p
2 matches
Mail list logo
