Re: Requirements on signatures on debs

* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031206 18:10]: > I've tried to write down a list of requirements for the signature > names (and what should be signed). I'll update the web version of this > on http://debsigs.turmzimmer.net/policy.html After some discussions, I updated my proposal (and also th

Re: Requirements on signatures on debs (was: Revival of the signed debs discussion)

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First: There is now a version of debsigs that creats debs that the > apt-utils could cope with, see http://debsigs.turmzimmer.net/ (I tried > it with the unmodified apt-utils of woody). > > * Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031202 04:55]: > >