Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95

2006-11-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 06:47:02PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > (I don't know anything about these window managers, perhaps there are some > devoted fvwm1 followers so keeping it may be mandated. Somebody at least > cared enough to NMU it recently. popcon numbers alone should certainly not

Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95

2006-11-09 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 16:10, Daniel Martin wrote: [killing off fvwm95] > Now, what do people think of this idea? Anything that lessens the number of different window managers in Debian is a Good Thing(tm) ;-) popularity contest says this about the various fvwm packages: #rank name

Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95

2006-11-09 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Daniel & Marco, Am 2006-11-08 16:49:09, schrieb Marco d'Itri: > On Nov 08, Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Therefore, here's my proposal: I propose to write and maintain a set > > of configuration files for the current fvwm that cause fvwm to look > > and behave the way fvwm9

Re: Request for Help/Comments: fvwm95

2006-11-08 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 08, Daniel Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Therefore, here's my proposal: I propose to write and maintain a set > of configuration files for the current fvwm that cause fvwm to look > and behave the way fvwm95 does now under a C locale. The fvwm95 > package will be transitioned to this