Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-06 Thread Michael Gilbert
Patrick Strasser wrote: > schrieb Josselin Mouette am 2011-05-03 17:22: > > Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit : > > > Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one > > ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler. > > Now that'

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-04 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Josselin Mouette am 2011-05-03 17:22: > Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit : > Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one > ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler. Now that's really bad. Alternatives? Reporting u

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 18:19 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > Where is your RFH bug? I’m not the maintainer. I’m just one of the guys who happen to upload it when it gets too outdated. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit : > > schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23: > > > [..] details in the bug report. > > > > #625452 > > Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pi

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 17:23 +0200, Patrick Matthäi a écrit : > > Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one > > ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler. > > Which doesn't mean, that there won't be a new maintainer in the future, > who is willed t

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 03.05.2011 17:22, schrieb Josselin Mouette: Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit : schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23: [..] details in the bug report. #625452 Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one ever reads, since there

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 mai 2011 à 15:56 +0200, Patrick Strasser a écrit : > schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23: > > [..] details in the bug report. > > #625452 Congratulations, you have added yet another bug on the pile that no one ever reads, since there are no real maintainers for poppler. Che

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-03 15:23: > [..] details in the bug report. #625452 Patrick -- Engineers motto: cheap, good, fast: choose any two Patrick Strasser Student of Telemati_cs_, Techn. University Graz, Austria -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Patrick Strasser
schrieb Patrick Strasser am 2011-05-02 19:20: >> I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf) >> exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs. >> What would be the right way: > >> * File two bugs and refer to each other in a additional message >> * File one bug

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-03 Thread Amaya
Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > > I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...) > > Because you looked at okular first. True :) > okular uses libpoppler-qt4-3 which depends on libpoppler5. > Even more convoluted for evince. Absolutely! -- .''`.

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 02/05/2011 16:46, Amaya a écrit : > Patrick Strasser wrote: >> If d.devel.general is the wrong group, I beg you all pardon and would >> be thankful for naming a proper group. > > I'm inclined to believe that discussing propper BTS handling

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library. > > I knew it! :) > I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...) Because you looked at okular first. okular uses libpoppler-qt4-3 which depend

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 07:20:12PM +0200, Patrick Strasser wrote: > Hello! > > I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf) > exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs. > What would be the right way: > * File two bugs and refer to each other in a addition

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread Amaya
Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library. I knew it! :) I guess I missed it (wonder how on earth...) -- .''`. Hate's no fun if you keep it to yourself : :' : -- The life of David Gale `. `' `-Proudly running Debian GNU/Linu

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 05/02/2011 10:46 PM, Amaya wrote: Patrick Strasser wrote: I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf) exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs. Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is appreciated. What would be the right way: *

Re: Reporting same bug in different packages

2011-05-02 Thread Amaya
Patrick Strasser wrote: > I want to report a bug, which occurs in two packages (okular, xpdf) > exactly the same way. It's a problem with rendering PDFs. Thanks for spotting this bug. Your contribution to Debian is appreciated. > What would be the right way: > * File two bugs and refer to each ot