In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: > When mainstream is updated, hello-1.3 -> hello-1.4
: > Non-usual-maintainer updates, hello-1.3-8 -> hello-1.4-0.1
: > Usual-maintainer updates, hello-1.3-8 -> hello-1.4-1
: >
: > Usual-maintainer should never use -0 for revisions.
:
: I think this se
> > > Non-usual-maintainer updates, hello-1.3-8 -> hello-1.4-0.1
> > > Usual-maintainer updates, hello-1.3-8 -> hello-1.4-1
> > >
> > > Usual-maintainer should never use -0 for revisions.
> > > And if we agree on this, it should be mandated in the manual.
> >
> > I think this seems reasonable. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes ("Re: Releases other than by the
package maintainert"):
> [Ian Jackson:]
> > (b) that the non-usual-maintainer releases should use a particular
> > revision format: eg, hello-1.3-8 would become hello-1.3-8.1.
>
> Seems very right to m
> (b) that the non-usual-maintainer releases should use a particular
> revision format: eg, hello-1.3-8 would become hello-1.3-8.1.
Seems very right to me. But I would like to add the following to it.
When mainstream is updated, hello-1.3 -> hello-1.4
Non-usual-maintainer updates, hello-1.
4 matches
Mail list logo
