On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:05:24PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
Holger Levsen wrote:
>btw, google has no (good) hits for "sarge releasenotes", but for "sarge
>release notes" they have... maybe this helps.
>
>
Try "sarge release notes"
- Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why not? Isn't
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-upgradingpackages
> sufficient?
the document suggests:
,
| aptitude -f --with-suggests --with-recommends dist-upgrade
`
but
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:05:24PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
Quoting Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> > and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> > plan?
>
> Why is this a worthwhile use of a release
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> plan?
Can you tell me about the usefulness of whining[1] about release policy
for year
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you tell about the possible risks that may affect your release plan
> and what you have done to ensure that they will not delay your release
> plan?
Why is this a worthwhile use of a release manager's time? How about we
analyse the release /after/ we
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:46:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> 30 May 2005
> Release
>
> And if everything goes well, we'll be ready to release at the end of the
> month.
>...
Setting goals is the easy part of release management.
Ensuring that the goals are met is the hard part of th
Hi Javier,
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 13:49, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least
> > to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm
> > either.
> Why not? Isn't
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:23:25AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
> This might be related to the fact the they're somewhat hidden, at least
> to ./google "sarge releasenotes" -
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/releasenotes isn't helpful atm either.
Why not? Isn't
http://www.debian.org/r
Package: www.debian.org
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 21:46, Steve Langasek posted a fine mail about a fine
change (thanks for both to whom it may apply).
Whohoo! :-)
Regarding testing upgrades from woody, I would like to propose mentioning
more visible that the suggested upgrade tool is aptitud
11 matches
Mail list logo
