On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:16:58AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote on
debian-med list[1] but the discussion should be here on debian-devel
(Reply-To is set):
> > Once we are at the topic of web tools: I'm really waiting for an answer
> > from you why you think that mgltools fit in your categories Fr
Sven Mueller schrieb:
> Comming back to icedove, an example would be the calendar plugin (which
> is not in Debian as far as I know).
You're thinking of iceowl-extension I guess? Using it here and it's
definitely in Debian ;)
> Regards,
> Sven
Christoph
--
/"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key
Gunnar Wolf schrieb:
> James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
>> I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
>> you to add it to the package that "cares" about it more.
>
> I agree with your analysis. But, if this is the case, the treatment
> should b
James Westby dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100]:
> > Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’ relationship to
> > the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’ relationship seems
> > redundant in that case.
>
> No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another with
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26:24AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > How do you imagine a technical implementation of a 'Enhances' field?
> > Something
> > like 'apt::install-enhances'?
I do not *want* this personally - I just wanted to know if any tool
makes use of this field in some way.
> Th
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
> > be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
> > there is a technical implementation of the *Enhances* field.
> Personally, I'd would never set eve
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>>apt-get --include-suggest install
>>>
>> -o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
>
> Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
> be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main que
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> >apt-get --include-suggest install
> >
> -o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
be not easy enough to find. But anyway, my main question was whether
there is a
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I even failed to grep "man apt-get" for the string "suggests" so
> I think I can not do something like
>
>apt-get --include-suggest install
>
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:44:49AM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> I see it as an almost bi-directional relationship, but one that allows
> you to add it to the package that "cares" about it more.
So the answers somehow draw a sketch about the concept behind the
Enhances field - but is it technically
James Westby writes:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Yet a package of a plugin should surely have a ‘Depends’
> > relationship to the application package. Adding an ‘Enhances’
> > relationship seems redundant in that case.
>
> No, there are plenty of packages which depend on another without
> enhancing t
Ben Finney wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>>> As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or less) the same
>>> effect as "B suggests A". Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
>>> be redundant.
>> A plugin "enhances" the a
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or less) the same
> > effect as "B suggests A". Thus, the reverse Suggests relation would
> > be redundant.
>
> A plugin "enhances" the application it works in
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 22:36 +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > What exactly means "similar". Assume package foo enhances package bar.
> > Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
> > is this conclus
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> What exactly means "similar". Assume package foo enhances package bar.
> Does this mean that in turn package bar should Suggest package foo or
> is this conclusion not really valid?
As I understand it, "A enhances B" has (more or le
15 matches
Mail list logo
