Re: Rebuilding old packages to get rid of overalignment on amd64 which reduces ASLR

2024-03-12 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 9:30 AM Mathias Krause wrote: > That works for me. The 32-bit time_t transition Jeremy mentioned seems > like a good candidate to force a rebuild of a lot of packages. Is there > an ETA for it? I found [1] which mentions to do the transition in > January but we've March alr

Re: Rebuilding old packages to get rid of overalignment on amd64 which reduces ASLR

2024-03-12 Thread Mathias Krause
On 11.03.24 00:41, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:48 +0100, Mathias Krause wrote: >> To get rid of the over-alignment, a rebuild with a linker that >> doesn't enforce the overly huge alignment any more is sufficient. >> In Debian terms that would be anything starting with buster

Re: Rebuilding old packages to get rid of overalignment on amd64 which reduces ASLR

2024-03-10 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:48 +0100, Mathias Krause wrote: > > To get rid of the over-alignment, a rebuild with a linker that > doesn't enforce > the overly huge alignment any more is sufficient. In Debian terms > that would be > anything starting with buster. > > I, thereby, request to rebuild aff

Re: Rebuilding old packages to get rid of overalignment on amd64 which reduces ASLR

2024-03-07 Thread Jeremy Bícha
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 6:06 AM Mathias Krause wrote: > I, thereby, request to rebuild affected packages. We are rebuilding thousands of packages for the ongoing 32-bit time_t transition. Maybe you can propose this again after the rebuilds for that are finished? Thank you, Jeremy Bícha