Re: Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Dan writ: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:15:36AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > > > Err. You're saying Xprint is the only print implementation that can > > > print non-latin stuff properly and reliably? > > > > > > > Yes, that's right. > > > > I didn't set Mozilla up with anything special at

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-04 Thread Drew Parsons
Frank wrote: > >> The > >> CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nicely, it's a PostScript > >> printer. > > > > Not on my computer. The CUPS queues (and default postscript for that > > matter) are broke in latest firefox on my system. "Paper size not > > supported", bug #344401. Time to c

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-04 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:15:36AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > Wouter asked: > > > > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of > > > > Xprint?

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
Frank wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > >> Wouter asked: > >> > > >> > Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of > >> > Xprint? > >> > >> http://www.dailynews.co.th/ > >> > The > CUPS queues print those thai (?) letters very nice

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Wouter asked: > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not > > > > g

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-03 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > Wouter asked: > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not > > > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and

Re: Re: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8

2006-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
Wouter asked: > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > This library isn't truly abandoned by upstream, but essentially it's not > > getting any new development. Cairo is considered the way forward and xprint > > is widely (though not universally) considered a broken impl