Re: Re: Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstreamproject

2003-11-07 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Joe Buck wrote, in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200311/msg00376.html: The GPL requires that anyone who receives the work also either receives the source for the work (the preferred form for making changes), or... Not quite; it requires that anyone *given* the work is als

Re: Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstreamproject

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Buck
> Well, given you talk about being a pure GPL project, why not put your > documentation under the GPL as well? Even if you were writing in > plain text or in a WYSIWYG program, it's a reasonable choice. But > given you're writing in docbook, with a very clear > source-compiled-to-object mapping,