Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Paul Wise writes: > I am missing the justification for the last paragraph of Debian Policy > section 2.5. I feel that it may have been due to a limitation of our > tools in the past and that these days there are zero downsides to this > situation (debootstrap/etc handle it fine) so we should prob

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 31.08.2014 17:58, schrieb Paul Wise: > There is also a downside to raising priorities in this way; raising > the priority of dependencies of higher-priority packages means that if > implementations of higher-priority packages change and the (now higher > priority) dependencies are no longer need

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > The problem that set off this entire discussion is the question of whether > we want to raise the priority of perl, perl-modules, and > init-system-helpers to important to match rsyslog, move the Perl modules > used by init-system-helpers to p

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Gerrit Pape writes: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 09:30:17AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Also, I'll reiterate what I said on debian-policy on this topic: the >> current Policy discussion of priorities is deceptive, since it implies > I don't think the discussion on the issue I raised is deceptive

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Gerrit Pape > When having such bugs filed, and the release team decides they shall not > be release critical, this shall be made public, the severities of > corresponding bugs adjusted, and everything is fine and transparent. > Currently I'm not aware of such a release team's decision. You mi

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-31 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 09:30:17AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Gerrit Pape writes: > > [0] Actually policy 2.5 requires to additionally file a RC bug to the > > high priority package with the added dependency to prevent it from being > > migrated to testing until the override decision has been ma

Re: Raising priority of Debian packages

2014-08-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Gerrit Pape writes: > [0] Actually policy 2.5 requires to additionally file a RC bug to the > high priority package with the added dependency to prevent it from being > migrated to testing until the override decision has been made. Policy does not address RC bugs at all. The determination of wh