Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-08 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 09:52:11AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > This one bites me a bit. O_DIRECT is missing from bits/fcntl.h on powerpc > > (at least on my installation and i sure i didn't mess with libc6-dev). It's > > sid/unstable branch. I don't remeber if the intel box i compiled xfspro

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-08 Thread Michel Dänzer
Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: === mkfile === gcc -g -DDEBUG -funsigned-char -Wall -I../include '-DVERSION="1.2.4"' -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXFS_BIG_FILES=1 -DXFS_BIG_FILESYSTEMS=1 -c -o xfs_mkfile.o

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"Just a friendly Jedi Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway if there is somone outthere willing to try powerpc xfsprogs please > point your apt-get at > > deb ftp://ftp.plukwa.net/debian-local sid main I would like to but your server is not responding to ftp requests... jas.

Re: xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:27:18PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > Nathan Scott from SGI send me patch but it didn't work. I now figured some > other way to fix that and it seems it partially worked (now it quits with: It looks like my "fix" made the trick (i mailed my solution to Na

xfs,powerpc, gcc (was Re: RaiserFS PPC status)

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:03:57AM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight > > > wrote: > ...

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

2001-05-07 Thread Rahul Jain
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: ... > > you should stick to gcc 2.95 for compiling the kernel, and probably the

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

2001-05-07 Thread Just a friendly Jedi Knight
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:58:02PM -0500, Rahul Jain wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > > You mean XFS from Linus kernel tree? there are some patches on > > penguinppc.org > > This is not in Linus's kernel tree. Are you using SGI's 1.0 release

Re: RaiserFS PPC status

2001-05-06 Thread Rahul Jain
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:03:43AM +0200, Just a friendly Jedi Knight wrote: > You mean XFS from Linus kernel tree? there are some patches on > penguinppc.org This is not in Linus's kernel tree. Are you using SGI's 1.0 release? In any case, that should not affect the compilation of the tools muc