Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-12 Thread Michael Meskes
[Removing the bugs crossposting.] > > If you're interested, how about becoming a member of the team? > >Actually, I'm already listed as a member... (Robert Clay, 'jame- > guest') Oops, so have at it and fix the bugs. Just kidding, but thanks for being part and helping. Art, any idea when

Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-12 Thread Robert J. Clay
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > Robert, > >> If not I'm going to have it removed I guess. >> >> I'd be against that. > > Me too, but somebody has to be able to put some time into it. :) > >> I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update to Stretch >> because ci

Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-12 Thread Michael Meskes
Robert, > If not I'm going to have it removed I guess. > > I'd be against that. Me too, but somebody has to be able to put some time into it. :) > I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update to Stretch > because citadel won't run on it yet; and the Citadel install there > is > one

Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-12 Thread Robert J. Clay
Michael, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > Anyone interested in citadel/webcit? I am. (As well as the rest of the citadel packages of course.) > If not I'm going to have it removed I guess. I'd be against that. I have a Jessie installed system that I can't update

Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-12 Thread Michael Meskes
> You can change the b-d to libical2-dev to still build with the old > libical > version. afaics it doesn't link with packages now linked with > libical3. Sorry, should have said that I was referring to libssl 1.0 vs 1.1 Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes d

Re: RFH: citadel/webcit

2017-12-11 Thread Matthias Klose
On 11.12.2017 13:42, Michael Meskes wrote: > Anyone interested in citadel/webcit? If not I'm going to have it removed I > guess. > > There used to be a team maintaining these packages, but I'm the only one who > worked on it in recent years. Not having used the software myself I don't > really in