Re: RFC transitioning to gnutls28

2011-10-16 Thread Andreas Metzler
Russ Allbery wrote: > m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: >> On Oct 15, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> * It uses nettle instead of gcrypt as crypto backend[1]. Packages that >> Why? If gcrypt supported GCM, it might be added back as supported backend. > Does that fix the problems with using GnuT

Re: RFC transitioning to gnutls28

2011-10-15 Thread Russ Allbery
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Oct 15, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> * It uses nettle instead of gcrypt as crypto backend[1]. Packages that > Why? Does that fix the problems with using GnuTLS in setuid programs? -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Re: RFC transitioning to gnutls28

2011-10-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 15 octobre 2011 à 17:52 +0200, Andreas Metzler a écrit : > gnutls28 (that is GnuTLS 3.x) has been available in experimental for > quite some time. While the API breakage compared to gnutls26 (2.x) is > not too bad It doesn’t require large changes, but it can break in subtle ways. For ex

Re: RFC transitioning to gnutls28

2011-10-15 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 15, Andreas Metzler wrote: > * It uses nettle instead of gcrypt as crypto backend[1]. Packages that Why? -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature