Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 12:12), Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: > >> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > > But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wra

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: >> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: >> > * Make it easier for package maintainers >> > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ >>

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 13:16), Lars Wirzenius wrote: > pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto > required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect > everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very g

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread Lars Wirzenius
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > > > * Make it easier for package maintainers > > > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ > > > > How badly

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: > pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > > * Make it easier for package maintainers > > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ > > How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that > it doe

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:03:13AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > > * Make it easier for package maintainers > > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ > > How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designin

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread Lars Wirzenius
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: > * Make it easier for package maintainers > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that it doesn't require debhelper? -- One does not see anything