Joe Smith wrote:
> How about if it meets the folowing critieria:
>
> 1. it has been in testing for 10 days (been in sid at least 20 days)
This means the security hole was disclosed at least 20 days ago,
probably more.
> 2. Iff it fixes a critical security problem, uploaded to security (This
> re
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 17:19 -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> I think the no new upstream versions is stable rule needs to be more
> flexible anyway. I have seen times where EVERY SINGLE change except for the
> version number have been backported. That is often the case where the new
> release consists
How about if it meets the folowing critieria:
1. it has been in testing for 10 days (been in sid at least 20 days)
2. the version is sid is the same as in testing (the maintainer has not
found problems in the ten days since it entered testing)
3. and has no RC bugs (no rc bugs reported in the te
3 matches
Mail list logo
