Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package

2007-09-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:25, Simon Richter wrote: >> inspired by the "how to detect if inside a buildd chroot" thread: would >> it make sense to have an (empty) package "autobuilder" that all packages >> that are not supposed to be install

Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package

2007-09-25 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:25, Simon Richter wrote: > inspired by the "how to detect if inside a buildd chroot" thread: would > it make sense to have an (empty) package "autobuilder" that all packages > that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders (daemons, packages > requiring i

Re: RFC: "autobuilder" pseudo-package

2007-09-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > inspired by the "how to detect if inside a buildd chroot" thread: > would it make sense to have an (empty) package "autobuilder" that all > packages that are not supposed to be installed on autobuilders > (daemons, packages requiring interactive