Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-27 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:37:23PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote: > Heh, actually there is an ambiguity there... I should have spotted it. > What I mean is: > > Add the specific dependence in each language package to apertium and not > to libpcre3. The language packages already depend on apertium, bu

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Thomas Weber
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Francis Tyers wrote: > We've come up with a better solution, which is to add dependencies to > the apertium package, and then make the apertium package depend on a > particular version of pcre3. It's safer this way, as I can't find out > anything about comp

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:57:55 +0200]: > Package: apertium > Provides: apertium-pcre-1 > And then, each time you detect a new incompatible version of pcre, you > make apertium Provide: apertium-pcre-2. This is of course fragile, so you may want to go for: Package: apertium

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:37:23 +0200]: Hi again, > Heh, actually there is an ambiguity there... I should have spotted it. > What I mean is: > Add the specific dependence in each language package to apertium and not > to libpcre3. The language packages already depend on apertium, but

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Francis Tyers
El sáb, 25-10-2008 a las 18:32 +0200, Adeodato Simó escribió: > * Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:47 +0200]: > > > Yep, this is the case, it includes pre-compiled regular expressions and > > these appear to be incompatible between versions of pcre. > > Ok. > > > [...snip...] > > > > > the

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Francis Tyers
El sáb, 25-10-2008 a las 18:32 +0200, Adeodato Simó escribió: > * Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:47 +0200]: > > > Yep, this is the case, it includes pre-compiled regular expressions and > > these appear to be incompatible between versions of pcre. > > Ok. > > > [...snip...] > > > > > th

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Francis Tyers
El vie, 24-10-2008 a las 00:06 +0200, Adeodato Simó escribió: > * Francis Tyers [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:47:20 +0200]: > > > Hi, > > Hello, Francis. > > > The bug is that the language packages require a specific version of > > libpcre to function. > > Could you explain a bit the technical backgroun

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Francis Tyers [Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:25:47 +0200]: > Yep, this is the case, it includes pre-compiled regular expressions and > these appear to be incompatible between versions of pcre. Ok. > [...snip...] > > > then set a Depend in the language packages to that > > > particular version of aperti

Re: RC bug for >10 packages

2008-10-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Francis Tyers [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:47:20 +0200]: > Hi, Hello, Francis. > The bug is that the language packages require a specific version of > libpcre to function. Could you explain a bit the technical background for this? Do the data files in the language packages embed any data that is pcre