Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mount point. For the others, edit /etc/default/rcS and set RAMRUN and > RAMLOCK to 'yes'. There are still some packages unable to cope with Hmm, is there any argument against making /etc/default/rcS a conffile or an ucf file to make sure - or at l

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Aleksey Midenkov] > It is possible to detect if kernel supports tmpfs and mount it on > /var/run, /var/lock, /var/tmp and maybe /tmp and may be other > places. All of these except /var/tmp/ should be possible to mount as tmpfs. To list /tmp/ as tmpfs, just update /etc/fstab to list it as a tmpfs

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Aleksey Midenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.30.0902 +0100]: >> It is possible to detect if kernel supports tmpfs and mount it >> on /var/run, /var/lock, /var/tmp and maybe /tmp and may be other places. > > Definitely not /var/run, since

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Am Mo den 30. Okt 2006 um 9:02 schrieb Aleksey Midenkov: > It is possible to detect if kernel supports tmpfs and mount it > on /var/run, /var/lock, /var/tmp and maybe /tmp and may be other places. This Sounds interesting. Well, there is som

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 30 octobre 2006 à 09:41 +0100, martin f krafft a écrit : > also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.30.0933 +0100]: > > /var/run is problematic because its subdirectories are expected to > > survive across reboots. > > http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20060917.0

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.30.0933 +0100]: > /var/run is problematic because its subdirectories are expected to > survive across reboots. http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20060917.012252.259a8f74.en.html I disagree, but anyway: this discussion has already

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 30 octobre 2006 à 15:02 +0700, Aleksey Midenkov a écrit : > Hello all the Debian Community! > > It is possible to detect if kernel supports tmpfs and mount it > on /var/run, /var/lock, /var/tmp and maybe /tmp and may be other places. This > can be made in one of the appropriate debian p

Re: Question: mount /var/run as tmpfs

2006-10-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Aleksey Midenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.30.0902 +0100]: > It is possible to detect if kernel supports tmpfs and mount it > on /var/run, /var/lock, /var/tmp and maybe /tmp and may be other places. Definitely not /var/run, since its contents can survive reboots. /var/run works fin