On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone mor
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone more information?
python 2.6 wi
Le jeudi 27 août 2009 à 19:05 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > * fixing paths from site-packages to *-packages (since the path
> > now depends on the Python version, yay)
>
> I may be confused by this, but so far as I can tell, I don't have to do
> anything for this to work for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery ha scritto:
>> First, the installation path changed from site-packages to
>> dist-packages. This means that most Python packages will need two
>> changes:
>
>> * passing --install-layout=deb to setup.py
>
> Okay, that's easy enoug
I have a program that depends on 2.6 but I can't seem to get the
required modules to install in squeeze/sid. The ones in the package
management system only work for 2.5. Is there some big transition
coming?
Mark
On Aug 27, 2009, at 21:05, Russ Allbery wrote:
Josselin Mouette writes:
Josselin Mouette writes:
> First, the installation path changed from site-packages to
> dist-packages. This means that most Python packages will need two
> changes:
> * passing --install-layout=deb to setup.py
Okay, that's easy enough. I assume that doesn't break builds for Python
2.5 (
Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:00:40 +0200
> Josselin Mouette napsal(a):
>
>> To put it simply:
>> * Most packages using cdbs should be safe.
>> * Some packages using dh (most of those building only one binary
>> package) should be safe.
>> * Al
Hi
Dne Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:00:40 +0200
Josselin Mouette napsal(a):
> To put it simply:
> * Most packages using cdbs should be safe.
> * Some packages using dh (most of those building only one binary
> package) should be safe.
> * All the rest needs updating, at least
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery ha scritto:
> Is there a best practice guide somewhere, and if we are doing a
> transition, a guide for those of us who only have ancillary involvement in
> Python packaging telling us what to do?
Some references can be found here (and in
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> There are two problems with adding Python 2.6 to the supported versions.
>
> First, the installation path changed from site-packages to
> dist-packages. This means that most Python packages will need two
> changes:
> * passing --install-layout=deb to setup.py
>
Le mardi 25 août 2009 à 10:10 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> I have a few packages that build either Python modules or that embed
> Python. I see that for the one that builds Python modules (remctl),
> Ubuntu has patched it for a Python 2.6 transition using new makefile
> machinery that I don't
11 matches
Mail list logo
