Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I'm strongly against that. I want packages properly tested and in your own
> interest you should wait for testing migration of your packages. (of course
> there can be exception, but not in general).
>
> I want well tested packages in bpo (which means tested by users, not
Re: Bernd Zeimetz 2010-06-30 <4c2b6f9b.8030...@bzed.de>
> > I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> > backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> > backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
>
> 80 messages in a mont
On 06/30/2010 02:53 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
80 messages in a month
Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> Hello again,
>
> I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
Not, currentl
Hello again,
I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
Cheers,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.
* Andrei Popescu [2010-06-30 13:10:20 CEST]:
> On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I'm strongly against that. I want packages properly tested and in your own
> > interest you should wait for testing migration of your packages. (of course
> > there can be exception, but not in gen
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 13:18:59, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the backports upload queue could automatically put the package on
> > hold until the unstable package has migrated to testing.
> Send patches :)
Sorry, should have mentioned it's just an ideea of mine and I posted it
for the benef
Andrei Popescu schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> > >
> > > When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> > > upload of backports prepared by the o
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> >
> > When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> > upload of backports prepared by the original maintainer, before testing
> > migration. For instance in s
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 19:47:52 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> upload of backports prepared by the original maintainer, before testing
> migration.
I, for one, certainly hope this one won't be relaxed.
Cheers,
Julien
Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
Hi,
*snip*
> Thanks for the fast answer!
>
> First of all, I would like to make clear that I am not trying to bikeshed
> xulrunner: I am more self-centered than this and was only thinking on how to
> use backports.debian.org for the Debia
> > The current upload policy is well adapted to the fact that a backport can be
> > maintained by a different person from the official package maintainers. But
> > when backports are prepared by the same team as the main package, can the
> > rules
> > be relaxed ?
> I don't understand this questi
Hi,
> Dear Alexander, backport.org people, and everybody,
>
> If I understand correctly, it is planned to incorporate the backports.org
> service as an official Debian repository.
Thats true.
>
> I would like to know if the policy of use for backports.debian.org has already
> been discussed, d
13 matches
Mail list logo
