Steve Langasek writes:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runti
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:25:44AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if debhelper compat 9 is set
> with no ${misc:PreDepends} set because that prevents the
> multiarch-support addition. A failure to convert ${misc:PreDepends} to
> multiarch-support would be a de
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> > > library in a multiarc
Simon McVittie writes:
> * lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
> multiarch directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
Yes, this is what we did for the X.org transition and it seemed to work
reasonably well.
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:47:01 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> [...]
> > Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
> > a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
> > protects against uploading p
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> Lintian error (and an ftpmaster REJECT) if a binary package (not just
> a library) has multiarch paths without debhelper compat 9. (This
> protects against uploading packages converted with tools like
> dpkg-cross -M -A (>= 2.6.3).)
[.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:12:29 +0100
Simon McVittie wrote:
> * lintian should warn (error?) if a binary package has libraries in a
> multiarch
> directory and doesn't pre-depend on multiarch-support
>
> * lintian should perhaps also warn if a package uses debhelper compat 9
> and doesn't pre-d
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 at 11:12:54 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> > library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> > metapackage 'multiar
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> metapackage 'multiarch-support'.
And the dependency would be added by either dpkg-dev,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:31:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> > library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> > metapackage 'mul
Steve Langasek writes:
> One of the things that held up the deployment of multiarch-friendly
> library packages in Debian was the recognition that the host triplet
> used on i386, i486-linux-gnu, was not suitable for cross-distro
> standardization because it encodes information about the current
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:36:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Specifically, the plan is that any package in wheezy shipping a runtime
> library in a multiarch directory should declare a Pre-Depends on the
> metapackage 'multiarch-support'. This package will be built from eglibc
> source, and f
12 matches
Mail list logo
