Re: Proposed documentation/script changes for potato (ntp/chrony/util-linux)

2000-03-22 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This advice ignores the admonitions I've read in many places that one > should never adjust the system clock discontinuously, especially not > backwards. Do you have any thoughts on this? Check into ntp, that will do the right thing. (It slows your clock down

Re: Proposed documentation/script changes for potato (ntp/chrony/util-linux)

2000-03-22 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:56:54AM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > I don't read debian-devel frequently, so I just caught up on all this > discussion, however I did file one of the bugs about this. Thank you > for taking on this issue! I have on

Re: Proposed documentation/script changes for potato (ntp/chrony/util-linux)

2000-03-22 Thread andrew
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 01:56:54AM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > Attached you'll find context diff files against files in the ntp, chrony and > util-linux packages, as well as a new README.Debian.hwclock file for the > util-linux package. I don't read debian-devel frequently, so I just caugh