Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-23 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> Seconded. Please follow the mail headers in the original mail and send this to the place where vote stuff belongs: debian-v...@lists.debian.org. That is, if you want it to count anything. :) -- bye, Joerg [2.6.15.4 direkt nach 2.6.15.3] Linus muss Gentooler hassen. wieso? Naja, die dürfte

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Gustavo Noronha
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:47 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initi

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
[second try, this with mutt instead of tin] In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote: [...] > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debi

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:39:13PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de> > (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote: > [...] > > PROPOSAL START > > > > General Resolutions are an im

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In article <87vdq3gcf6@vorlon.ganneff.de> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote: [...] > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the D

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Mark Hymers
On Sat, 21, Mar, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert spoke thus.. > - - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > [ ] Choice 1: Enhance seconders to 2Q [3:1] > [ ] Choice 2: Enhance seconders to Q [3:1] > [ ] Choice 3: Further Discussion > - - - -=-=-=-=-=