lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian Developerslist
> Subject: Roxen virtual servers, was: Re: ProFTPd being lame
> Resent-Date: 21 Sep 1999 11:23:17 -
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
>
> * "David" == Da
* "David" == David Bristel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David> I was refering to the equivilant of a section
David> in Apache...to just send Roxen the information for a new
David> account, including IP address and directories, and have it do
David> it automatically without admin intervention. Whi
Robert Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
>
> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David Bristel wrote:
>
> >
> > The only feature it lacks is the ability to do automated account s
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, David Bristel wrote:
>
> The only feature it lacks is the ability to do automated account setup from
> another script. (Which is the ONLY thing that apache does better than Roxen).
> Maybe I'll tinker a bit and make a module for auto-creation of new web
> accounts
> from a
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Anders Arnholm wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 12:18:53 +0200
> From: Anders Arnholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Robert Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: ProFTPd
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Raul Miller wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 00:29:10 -0400
> From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Robert Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: ProFTPd being lame
> Roxen does, at least if you have different IP numbers, I can't get IP-less
> vistual hosting to work with ftp sessions. And as a ISP the security issues
> of
You can't get name-based virtual hosting with FTP. The protocol doesn't
transmit a hostname.
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 06:49:55PM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote:
> I use Roxen exclusively as a httpd where I have a say on the matter,
> but it is mainly a httpd, and lacks configuration features (like
> chrooting some selected users into different roots) I use with
> proftpd, although I have a
* "Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raul> On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
>> Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
>> stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
>> anon ftp sites as provided besides pr
>>>Robert Stone wrote:
> Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
> stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual anon ftp
> sites as provided besides proftpd.
Roxen does, at least if you have different IP numbers, I can't get IP-less
vistual
On Sat, Sep 18, 1999 at 04:21:34PM -0700, Robert Stone wrote:
> Virtualhosting in proftpd is far easier than with wu-ftpd. As it
> stands now, I don't believe any debian ftp server supports virtual
> anon ftp sites as provided besides proftpd.
roxen does.
--
Raul
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:46:52AM +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
> Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because
> it seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is
> it being deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this
> way?
>
The OpenBSD f
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:41:01PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 17, "J.H.M. Dassen Ray\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Speaking of FTP servers, has anyone taken a good look at troll-ftpd
> >(ftp://ftp.troll.no/freebies/ftpd)?
> I did. IMO it's still unsuitable for big servers (it lacks fe
On Sep 17, "J.H.M. Dassen Ray\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Speaking of FTP servers, has anyone taken a good look at troll-ftpd
>(ftp://ftp.troll.no/freebies/ftpd)?
I did. IMO it's still unsuitable for big servers (it lacks features like
"site exec" and a log analyzer) and it does not look desig
On Sep 17, Chris Rutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because
>it seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is
>it being deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this
>way?
It lacks a lot of features needed
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:46:52 +0100, Chris Rutter wrote:
> Most people I know prefer using the OpenBSD-derived server, because it
> seems to be more stable and less buggy than the rest -- why is it being
> deprecated by Debian (or Herbert, I don't know) in this way?
Speaking of FTP servers, has
Re: all the bug-finding in ProFTPd (I just read the SuSE notice about
it being dropped for lameness reasons, including it *still* being
vulnerable to remote exploit) -- if it is, indeed, *that* bad
(and the common consensus among admins I know is that it is), perhaps
the netkit ftpd shouldn't come
17 matches
Mail list logo
