Re: Possible transition to GCC 4.1 for etch: coordinated NMUs

2006-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-12 15:01]: > > As it turns out, bug blockers currently don't display information > > about the package those bugs are in and what their status is (e.g. if > > there's a patch already). > > But this could be added. It would be a nice feature to re

Re: Possible transition to GCC 4.1 for etch: coordinated NMUs

2006-05-12 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As it turns out, bug blockers currently don't display information > about the package those bugs are in and what their status is (e.g. if > there's a patch already). But this could be added. It would be a nice feature to request. (Hint hint) -- T

Re: Possible transition to GCC 4.1 for etch: coordinated NMUs

2006-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-12 18:07]: > I have filed the following meta bug to keep track of GCC 4.1 build > failures in packages: #366820 As it turns out, bug blockers currently don't display information about the package those bugs are in and what their status is (e.g. if th

Re: Possible transition to GCC 4.1 for etch: coordinated NMUs

2006-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-12 18:07]: > - Mon, May 29 - Mon, May 12: 2 weeks of coordinated NMUs. Please >email me privately if you're interested in helping out. > - Mon, May 12 - Thu, May 15: recompilation of the whole archive with >GCC 4.1 on several architecture t