On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22:02PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > We have the constraints that we should support upgrades from Lenny, so
> > we are stuck with apt/aptitude from lenny...
>
> Remove the dependency from libc-bin. As l
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:02:29PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We have the constraints that we should support upgrades from Lenny, so
> we are stuck with apt/aptitude from lenny...
Remove the dependency from libc-bin. As long a libc-bin does not have
maintainer scripts, this should work.
Basti
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:58:45PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Except saying "apt sucks", I currently do not have more idea. Someone
> > else maybe?
> >
> /me suggests to try cupt and hides
>
We have the constraints that we should support upgrades from Lenny, so
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Except saying "apt sucks", I currently do not have more idea. Someone
> else maybe?
>
/me suggests to try cupt and hides
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is
> >> enough. I'll upload a new versio
On 2009-07-29 22:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> In short it looks like a Pre-Depends is overkill, and that a Depends is
>> enough. I'll upload a new version soon to experimental to fix that.
>>
>
> eglibc version 2.9-23+multia
6 matches
Mail list logo
