> Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users and free
> > software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell users what is good".
> > Right?
> >
> Taken to the extreme, this would mean Debian would still require obsolete kernel version here
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users and free
> software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell users what is good".
> Right?
>
Taken to the extreme, this would mean Debian would still require because some users still need it for
obs
* Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080701 14:33]:
> No, you have to get rid of the stubborn users, first ;)
>
> @Bernhard: How about configuring you keyboard to whatever fits you better than
> the multikey sequence?
And waste keys for characters I can just write well (and just needing to
press
[Michael Tautschnig]
> Debian's Social Contract says that "Our priorities are our users and free
> software". It does _not_ say that "Debian should tell users what is good".
> Right?
Would it be appropriate here to propose a corollary to Godwin's Law
involving the first sentence of point 4 of the
Le 1 juil. 08 à 14:59, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 12:33:18 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 12:10 +0200, Thibaut Paumard kirjoitti:
Come on, UTF-8 is good.
UTF-8 also 16 years old. [...] Surely it's enough
age for a character set encoding to be accept
> Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 12:33:18 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> > ti, 2008-07-01 kello 12:10 +0200, Thibaut Paumard kirjoitti:
> > > Come on, UTF-8 is good.
> >
> > UTF-8 also 16 years old. That's enough for people to get driver's
> > licenses in the US, to have legal sex in many parts of the world,
Am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 12:33:18 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> ti, 2008-07-01 kello 12:10 +0200, Thibaut Paumard kirjoitti:
> > Come on, UTF-8 is good.
>
> UTF-8 also 16 years old. That's enough for people to get driver's
> licenses in the US, to have legal sex in many parts of the world, and to
> vo
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 12:10 +0200, Thibaut Paumard kirjoitti:
> Come on, UTF-8 is good.
UTF-8 also 16 years old. That's enough for people to get driver's
licenses in the US, to have legal sex in many parts of the world, and to
vote in local elections in some parts of the world. Surely it's enough
a
Le 30 juin 08 à 20:09, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
* Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080629 18:15]:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 21:53:24 schrieb Agustin Martin:
Each spellchecker has currently some special features.
Fortunately, the
only thing where ispell is stronger than the other spell
* Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080629 18:15]:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 21:53:24 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> > Each spellchecker has currently some special features. Fortunately, the
> > only thing where ispell is stronger than the other spellcheckers (support
> > for pseudocharsets like '
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 21:53:24 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> > Each spellchecker has currently some special features. Fortunately, the
> > only thing where ispell is stronger than the other spellcheckers (support
> > for pseudocharsets like 'a, "a, \'a, ... ) is already included in aspell
> > de
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2008 21:53:24 schrieb Agustin Martin:
> Each spellchecker has currently some special features. Fortunately, the
> only thing where ispell is stronger than the other spellcheckers (support
> for pseudocharsets like 'a, "a, \'a, ... ) is already included in aspell
> development
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:52:43AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I have no idea if it's trivially possible, but it would be ideal if
> > whatever spell checker we switched to had some sort of compatibility
> > layer for ispell to reduce the number of applications th
Hi,
Don Armstrong wrote:
> I have no idea if it's trivially possible, but it would be ideal if
> whatever spell checker we switched to had some sort of compatibility
> layer for ispell to reduce the number of applications that are
> affected by such a migration.
Both hunspell and aspell have such
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Bernd Zeimetz]
> > I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> > the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> > According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.htm
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Given the limitations of ispell, I would instead urge us all to
> migrate all our packages to use for example hunspell and drop ispell
> completely from the distribution. It would be a lot easier to
> maintain a dictionary i
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Bernd Zeimetz]
> > I'm forwarding this orphaning bug to debian-devel as I hope this rises
> > the chances to find somebody who is willing to take care of ispell.
> > According to http://ficus-www.cs.ucla.edu/geoff/ispell.html the version
> > in Deb
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 08:49:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> And it would be a lot easier to check spelling in any language if all
> programs supported a spell checker that supported any language, and
> not only the "simple" ones with a structure similar to English. :)
Even better would
18 matches
Mail list logo
