"Leo \"costela\" Antunes" writes ("Re: Please don't list available translations
in the package description"):
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to pu
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:54:57AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> every package is very wasteful of space. Thus, I think it should not be
> done. A better way to express the information is needed.
Indeed. If anyone can tell me how comparison among locale strings is
supposed to work, I can try to
Bah, sorry about the previous mail, sent it before it was finished.
On pe, 2007-12-07 at 15:28 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Friday 7 December 2007 11:52, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > If we want to implement a feature such that we can see what packages are
> > localised for a given language, that s
On pe, 2007-12-07 at 15:28 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Friday 7 December 2007 11:52, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > If we want to implement a feature such that we can see what packages are
> > localised for a given language, that should be done differently, most
> > likely by building a database sca
On Friday 7 December 2007 11:52, Enrico Zini wrote:
> If we want to implement a feature such that we can see what packages are
> localised for a given language, that should be done differently, most
> likely by building a database scanning what .po files are present in the
> source package.
Wouldn
Quoting Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'd also tend to think that generic internationalization support
> sentences are quite inappropriate into package long description.
> Support leve is generally subject to frequent changes, so why
> polluting descriptions with those things?
Su
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:10:35PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:40:43PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> > > Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> >
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Couldn't debtags support this sort of information in a good enough way
> (not via culture::*, but something like translated-in::*)?
> Or perhaps - if stricter solution is desired - implementing a new
> control field that could
On Friday 07 December 2007, Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
> > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > first.
>
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this in
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:40:43PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> > Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > > first.
> >
> > While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:52:08AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
> ldap-account-manager is not the only package doing this: a quick search
> gives me [...] gperiodic
I removed that in svn.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Stephen Gran wrote:
> At the moment, I'm inclined to agree with Enrico. I don't think it's
> all that helpful to have some small subset of all the programs actually
> translated into a given language returned in a search for that language
> string. It's both an incomplete list (since many other p
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Almost no packages currently do this, hence relying on the package
> description to check wether a package is localized for your language is
> completely unreliable.
Agreed.
> For a list of localised packages check http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/
> for y
This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
> > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > first.
>
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this inf
Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> first.
While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this information.
It may reduce the objectiveness of some searches, but it
15 matches
Mail list logo
