Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-03 Thread David Starner
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:35:08AM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:28:41 David Starner wrote: > > > Um, that's not what I've heard. Since optimizing for the Pentium > > will sometimes pessimize the Pentium (Pro, II, III), and the > > speedup from most programs is not that great

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 04:17:51AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > We all know how screwed up the former is. The latter has (and has had for > some time) several very obnoxious bugs which result in bad code on certain Definately - pgcc should be approached with some caution. It's also been known

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-03 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 01:40:51AM +0200, Romain Chantereau wrote: > > So the original question remains: is there a simple pgcc available > > somewhere? > > Yes ! is there a simple pgcc available somewhere? There may or may not be, however I highly recommend avoiding pgcc. There are exactly two

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-03 Thread Eray Ozkural
On Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:28:41 David Starner wrote: > Um, that's not what I've heard. Since optimizing for the Pentium > will sometimes pessimize the Pentium (Pro, II, III), and the > speedup from most programs is not that great, and anything that > needs it can be recompiled locally, it wasn't wort

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-02 Thread Romain Chantereau
> > So the original question remains: is there a simple pgcc available somewhere? > > -Jim Yes ! is there a simple pgcc available somewhere? I'm going to tell you why I want a pgcc package: I want to build a customized version of the potato. I have the sources, I compile the sources with pgcc i

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-02 Thread Jim Lynch
Hi, So the original question remains: is there a simple pgcc available somewhere? -Jim --- Jim Lynch Finger for pgp key as Laney College CIS admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.laney.edu/~jim/ as Debian developer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/~jwl/

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-02 Thread David Starner
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 10:11:44AM -0700, Jim Lynch wrote: > I think the answer is this: it is felt by debian developers that pgcc > deserves more: it should be included in its own architecture, You may > know that we have the architecture called 'i386', well, pgcc would come > in the architecture

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-02 Thread Jim Lynch
Hi, I think the answer is this: it is felt by debian developers that pgcc deserves more: it should be included in its own architecture, You may know that we have the architecture called 'i386', well, pgcc would come in the architecture called 'i586' with the idea that all packages in debian would

Re: Pgcc in Deb

2000-04-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 10:28:56PM +0200, Romain Chantereau wrote: > I looking for a pgcc debian distribution/package... But, nothing ! > I don't know why. > Is someone able to explain ? Basically, nobody voulenteered to maintain it. From the PGCC FAQ: | Q: Are there Debian packages of PGCC?