On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
[A whole bunch of stuff I severly trimmed because I like the sound
of my own voice. ^_^]
## apt-src install & build - NOT indentical
## Note: the build system has vanilla libc6, not the patched one
> $ debdiff ../dtach*.deb dtach_0.
Sorry for the delay..
For the record:
> > > > I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> > > > after installing the built source packages, aptitude/apt-get
> > > > absolutely want to upgrade them with the binary versions:
> > > > : The following package
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:19:30PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:19:30PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > >>> I got an iss
Hi, Sylvain:
El Viernes, 16 Septiembre 2005 16:12, Sylvain Beucler escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple Debian packages that I need to patch with custom local
> changes. The patches are small and I hence can follow the security
> updates from the security team.
>
> However, I wonder if there's a
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:19:30PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > >>> I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> > >>> after installi
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > >> I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> > >> after installing the built source packages, aptitude/apt-get
> > >> absolutely want
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:03:08PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:32:48AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> >> I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> >> after installing the
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:03:08PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:32:48AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> > after installing the built source packages, aptitude/apt-get
> > absolutely want to upgrad
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 10:32:48AM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I got an issue though, but I think it is related to glibc itself:
> after installing the built source packages, aptitude/apt-get
> absolutely want to upgrade them with the binary versions:
:: The following packages will be upgraded:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:26:37PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > I have a couple Debian packages that I need to patch with custom local
> > changes. The patches are small and I hence can follow the security
> > updates fr
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:12:44PM +0200, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> I have a couple Debian packages that I need to patch with custom local
> changes. The patches are small and I hence can follow the security
> updates from the security team.
[...]
>
> Is this kind of auto-patching already impleme
12 matches
Mail list logo
