On Dec 17, 2005 at 18:48, Simo Kauppi praised the llamas by saying:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:21:41PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > No, you have to _remove_ the offending code. Not only "disable it at
> > build-time", but not ship it at all, also not in the
> > source. Distributing infrin
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 03:21:41PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:56:29AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
>
> > Did you notice there so
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:56:29AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
>>> Are there any obvious reasons why swftools can't/shouldn't be
>>> packaged for Debian?
>> Nobody h
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:56:29AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
>
> > I was wondering, if anybody has been working on getting swftools
> > (http://www.swftools.org/) into Debian?
>
> Apparently, not recently.
>
> > There seems to
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> I was wondering, if anybody has been working on getting swftools
> (http://www.swftools.org/) into Debian?
Apparently, not recently.
> There seems to be an old RFP
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=187275 which has
>
5 matches
Mail list logo